> On 15 January 2015 at 01:07, Diogo F. S. Ramos <d...@riseup.net> wrote: >> I couldn't find a list of the supported Common Lisp implementations. Is >> there one? > > Probably not an accurate one. The README states "sbcl, clisp, ccl and > ecl". Makefile.in is likely a good list of those that people have > made it support in the past (although it's worth noting that "getting > it running" and "building an executable image" aren't exactly the same > problem - I've had it sort of running under abcl in the past).
Oh, thank you. Shame on me, I missed that README part. > wrappers.lisp contains a load of junk[0] which I believe was > originally copied verbatim from elsewhere. It should really be done > away with and replaced with compatibility libraries from quicklisp. I hope StumpWM does not start depending on Quicklisp. I run it using only Debian, even though README lists cl-xembed as a dependency and Debian does not have it in its repository. > Of course a major factor is which lisps currently have a working clx. > I believe the clx that most people use is currently under stewardship > of the sharplispers; they may have a list of implementations they aim > to support. Looking at <https://github.com/sharplispers/clx>, it seems they aim to support SBCL. _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
