On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Interesting bug. So the default dive created when simply doing "Add > Dive" and then saving the dive looks like this in Subsurface: > Works as designed :D But the design is clearly flawed with manually added dives. > > Linebreaks are mine for readability :-) > Easy way to format XML for readability : xmllint --format <input> > Rainer - is that fixed sample interval format the only format > divelogs.de understands? Or is there another format where we could give > the time stamp in the sample as we do in Subsurface? > > If not, I guess we'd have to create synthetic samples to try to get > "reasonably close" (in this case we could get it nearly perfectly). > Miika, would that be doable in your xslt or would we need to pre-process > things to have the correct samples? > It would be great to have the timestamp option, but I should be able to generate synthetic samples in XSLT as well. What is the time wise granularity of the manually added samples? 1 minute as the sample dive in bug report? Something larger than 1 second would be good here, as then it is easy to use that as sample interval and not end up with insanely large export file. miika
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
