On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Michael Likes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Attached is the screen shot of the stacked dives
That is quite impressive.
It certainly *looks* like we imported all those dives as one single
dive, and then had a really odd depth spike in between dives. In
addition, those first three dives seem to be each about 700 _minutes_
long, which is certainly possible with a rebreather, but judging from
your pressure graphs I'm assuming that's not it. So the sample rate is
wrong too. The impressive depth spike between dives is presumably then
the between-the-dive data being interpreted as bogus sample data with
random depths.
So at a guess, I'd say that libdivecomputer is terminally confuse,
possible due to some dive computer memory wrap-around issue. Jef?
Hopefully Jef will make more sense of your libdivecomputer dump.
Linus
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
