On 02-05-14 03:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Michael Likes <[email protected]> wrote:
Attached is the screen shot of the stacked dives
That is quite impressive.
It certainly *looks* like we imported all those dives as one single
dive, and then had a really odd depth spike in between dives. In
addition, those first three dives seem to be each about 700 _minutes_
long, which is certainly possible with a rebreather, but judging from
your pressure graphs I'm assuming that's not it. So the sample rate is
wrong too. The impressive depth spike between dives is presumably then
the between-the-dive data being interpreted as bogus sample data with
random depths.
So at a guess, I'd say that libdivecomputer is terminally confuse,
possible due to some dive computer memory wrap-around issue. Jef?
That's certainly possible.
Hopefully Jef will make more sense of your libdivecomputer dump.
@Michael: Can you also enable the libdivecomputer logfile? I need some piece of
data that is not part of the memory dump, but is logged to the logfile. It's
version string that is used to select the correct memory layout, so it's
important info for this his kind issue.
Jef
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
