On 30 May 2014, at 14:38, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 30.05.2014, at 12:17, Joakim Bygdell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Joakim, > > I will look at the problem with the last stop depth later when I have more > time. Just a quick comment: > >> NOTE. These values are from the planner window, not the saved plan. >> Also the transition times are shown in the final deco table, why not show >> them while in planner as well. > > I agree the two representations differ, but my aim was actually to change the > saved plan rather than the table. I actively suppressed the information about > transition times (and also waypoints where only the ascend speed changes) as > otherwise the table would get much longer and already now you have to scroll > far too early. The rationale was to provide only the really useful > information with the least clutter. Uncluttering the view is good, the problem right now is that the time specified on each depth is stop time + ascent time. Which gives the impression that some of the shallow stops are very long. If the idea to keep it clean then showing only the bare minimum, i.e the stop time at each depth is the way to go. Which means, separate them into two entries while only showing the stop time. > > The plan in the dive notes is supposed to be changed to a way that it can > directly be copied to wet notes (ideally printed) to take with you in the > water. There you want to only have the essential information and to me it > seems this is only the list of runtimes where you leave the stops and when to > change gas. During the dive you don’t worry about transition times you worry > about the ascend rate and that is directly determined by the depth (and not > the dive or the plan) so there is no point in listing that (and the > transition time that depends directly on it) in the dive notes that will be a > runtime table. If the notes are to be copied/printed they need in my eyes be much cleaner, only stating depth, stop time, runtime. > > But I am open to be convinced otherwise. We could also make that a user > preference. An option for the user to specify the ascent speed might be an idea, set as two values one for ascent speed up to first stop and another for ascent speed between stops. > > What do people think? > > Best > Robert > > -- > .oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO > Robert C. Helling Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics > Scientific Coordinator > Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik > Phone: +49 89 2180-4523 Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339 > http://www.atdotde.de > > Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints > A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515 BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D and > DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D 5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F > > > > _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
