On 04 Jun 2014, at 15:56, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: Dirk,
> Good. But why add that string a second time? Shouldn't we just have a > function in planner.c return the translated string and call that function? here is an updated version. As this is C (without ++) I opted for a global const char * rather than a global accessor method. Is this too lazy? Best Robert
0001-Disclaimer-included-in-the-printed-diveplan.patch
Description: Binary data
--
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO
Robert C. Helling Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Scientific Coordinator
Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik
print "Just another Phone: +49 89 2180-4523 Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339
stupid .sig\n"; http://www.atdotde.de
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
