On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:34:09PM +0200, Robert C. Helling wrote: > > > Good. But why add that string a second time? Shouldn't we just have a > > function in planner.c return the translated string and call that function? > > here is an updated version. As this is C (without ++) I opted for a > global const char * rather than a global accessor method. Is this too > lazy?
Nah, that's fine. Thanks /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
