On 01 July, 2014 - Robert C. Helling wrote: > > On 30 Jun 2014, at 20:43, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Linus, > > > Btw, should we really use a pO2 of 1.6 by default? I think PADI and > > others suggest 1.4 for recreational diving. I realize recreational > > diving also implies "no plan", and deco diving does tend to use 1.6 > > for the deco bottles, but this does sound like something people might > > want to change. And that "fill_default_cylinder()" function (and the > > cylinder depth it calculates) is used not just by planning. > > > > This is not new to your patch (which I agree with), my query is just > > triggered by seeing the patch.. The dive planner already has a setting > > for pO2 (separately for bottom time and deco), and we seem to be > > ignoring it here.. > > I would leave it that way as (at least to me) EAN50 at 21m and O2 at 6m is > somehow wired directly into my brain and those two assume 1.6 and not less. > In particular the planner would switch to pure O2 only at 3m which I don’t > think anybody does out there in the real world. >
Re-wiring it to use the mod/deco-po2-values we have in prefs would be better, but i got just confused when looking at all the different po2-values we keep in the prefs, so i didn't change that right now. //Anton -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
