On 04/08/2014 10:47, Miika Turkia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Willem Ferguson
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 04/08/2014 07:00, Miika Turkia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Willem Ferguson
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
N.B.:
The only outstanding issue that I am aware of, is the
discussion last week about including
depth and time pointers along the Y and X axes respectively
when the cursor is
moved about on the profile panel during manual profile
creation. This was true for V3 but has since
disappeared. I favour the inclusion of the pointers along the
depth and time axes.
Tomaz indicated that this could easily be done. Pending a
final decision on this issue
I might do a final modification or two to the text of the manual.
What is the solution to this going to be? I created a bug 674
during the weekend to remind, that the user manual is currently
not ready for release. It has to be updated regarding this
feature, whether the X/Y pointers are enabled or not.
miika
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
The manual can only be updated if pointers on the X and Y-axes are
indeed implemented. Taking into account the intense activity over
the last 10 days, the problems with the Win support and the fact
that Tomaz is obviously overloaded, I suggest that the issue about
pointers on the dive profile stays over for V4.3. Its is a
nice-to-have, not a blocker (and it should possibly go hand in
hand with adjusting the way zooming is performed on the dive
profile, as has been discussed a number of times). It just looks
to me there are more important issues at the moment to get V4.2
out. I hope this sounds sensible? :-)
I am happy either way, as long as the documentation matches the actual
functionality, or at least does not describe something that does not
exist. That is why I consider the current state a blocker... Updating
the documentation not to mention the markers at all would be quite
safe in any case. It is not confusing to not describe that feature
even if it exists, but it sure is confusing if it is documented but
missing.
miika
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Point taken. I have forgotten that the text about pointers has actually
not been removed and I have clearly not understood your point. Thank
you, Miika.
Kind regards,
willem
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
