On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:02 AM, Willem Ferguson <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>> 
>> I am happy either way, as long as the documentation matches the actual 
>> functionality, or at least does not describe something that does not exist. 
>> That is why I consider the current state a blocker...  Updating the 
>> documentation not to mention the markers at all would be quite safe in any 
>> case. It is not confusing to not describe that feature even if it exists, 
>> but it sure is confusing if it is documented but missing.
> Point taken. I have forgotten that the text about pointers has actually not 
> been removed and I have clearly not understood your point. Thank you, Miika.

Don’t remove it. I’m adding the mean depth back to the planner profile display. 
Already identified the problem, just looking for the right place to fix it.

/D

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to