On 03 Nov 2014, at 23:19, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:

Dirk,

I don't like this patch as it removes a feature. We have seen a few dive
computers that store a maximum dive depth in the dive header, but when you
go through the samples, none of the samples are that deep.

fair enough. Then it’s probably better done like this.

Attachment: 0001-Start-with-0-when-computing-maxdepth-when-fixing-up.patch
Description: Binary data


Best
Robert

PS: I don’t know why apple mail attaches patches as octet-stream.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to