On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:29:09PM +0100, Robert Helling wrote: > > On 03 Nov 2014, at 23:19, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dirk, > > > I don't like this patch as it removes a feature. We have seen a few dive > > computers that store a maximum dive depth in the dive header, but when you > > go through the samples, none of the samples are that deep. > > fair enough. Then it’s probably better done like this.
Yep, that I like. > PS: I don’t know why apple mail attaches patches as octet-stream. It's more magical that way :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
