On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:10:51PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > On 2 December 2014 at 19:22, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 02 December, 2014 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > All of those are "nice-to-have" but it's not like subsurface is useless > > without them. The only thing we need to test is that we actually still > > work with a libdivecomputer 0.4.2. It's quite a while since i last built > > Subsurface against such a old libdivecomputer version. > > > > > > as far as the building part goes i'm able to statically link this old version: > "Subsurface XX, built with libdivecomputer v0.2.0-devel".
COOL. > but i don't own a DC to test it. Have you played with Jef's dive computer simulator? It's pretty awesome and I often use it for testing. You can simulate quite a few dive computers (and even offer them to a VM and connect to the simulator running on Linux from within Windows running in the VM). Very useful. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
