On 2 December 2014 at 20:10, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2 December 2014 at 19:22, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 02 December, 2014 - Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>
>> All of those are "nice-to-have" but it's not like subsurface is useless
>> without them. The only thing we need to test is that we actually still
>> work with a libdivecomputer 0.4.2. It's quite a while since i last built
>> Subsurface against such a old libdivecomputer version.
>>
>>
>
> as far as the building part goes i'm able to statically link this old version:
> "Subsurface XX, built with libdivecomputer v0.2.0-devel".
>

erm, that's wrong because i don't use 'configure' and the default
value in DC's version.h remains v0.2.0-devel.
but i can confirm subsurface links with older DC versions.

lubomir
--
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to