On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:13:07AM -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > So I spent much of today completely redoing the way I create Windows > installers. I believe I have a working Qt5 based (!) Win32 installer and > would appreciate if a few people could give this a test, both on Win32 and > Win64. > > From my brief testing it appears to give an odd warning at start when > running on a 32bit Windows (it basically appears to always think it's > running on a 64bit Windows and "warns" about that, even if you are in fact > on 32bit Windows), but other than that I hope that it works :-) > > If this works well we might even consider going back to just one Windows > binary... now that Qt5 works on 32bit there isn't really much of a reason > to do a dedicated 64bit binary. Or am I missing something? Hmm... I seem > to think there was something with time_t that was odd, but I think we > fixed that, right? > > Anyway, please give it a try
Umm, yeah, and in case you are wondering, it's of course here: http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/daily/subsurface-4.3-137-g6a7ae13ebf4e-32bit.exe /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
