On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 31, 2014, at 2:11 AM, Davide DB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Miika Turkia <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Based on IRC discussions, I'd say yes. However, the "running average > depth" > >> display might (or might not) be implemented differently than what you > had in > >> mind. > > > > Win32 version runs smootly on my Win7 64bit system. > > Oh good. > > > It asked explicitily to install a 32bit version on a 64bit version. > > I believe it will ask everyone about this. If there are no issues with the > 32bit version > that we find, I’ll remove that check and release only one binary. > > > On start Subsurface ask me to migrate marble data from a previous > version. > > Yeah, I noticed that, too. That may be a Marble Qt4 -> Marble Qt5 thing? > I’m not > sure. > > > Running avg depth doesn't seem to be there. > > If your mouse hovers over the profile you should see a straight line from > time 0 > to the time where your mouse is located that indicates the average depth > until > then. That’s how Tomaz interpreted your request. I believe that isn’t what > you > had in mind, but maybe you can explain better what you had in mind (as my > attempt to explain this didn’t make sense to Tomaz and I figured that in > the > end I might be wrong as well). > your explanation made sense, I just understood something completely differently when I started coding, so I finished my idea. ;p and I liked my idea. Dirk, I think it was not added to the code, mostly because that doesn't seems to have been pushed. > /D > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
