Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:31:08PM +0100, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote:
- Uses latest Marble from official sources, no special branch or patches
necessary.
No. Not good. You get the weird Wiki-shit and strange context menues and
it tries to load plugins and all kind of oddities. We really don't want
the stock marble. Trust me
Yeah, I see the ugly wiki stuff. Haven't seen any other side effects
though.
- Fewer options in Subsurface qmake.
Disadvantages:
- Somewhat longer Marble build instructions. But I could make a script in
packages/macosx/ to fix that (if anyone wants it).
Have you looked at the SIZE of your marble libs? My guess is around
100MB...
Nope, the upstream libs were less than 7MB (even when astro was included
by mistake):
$ otool -L Subsurface.app/Contents/MacOS/Subsurface |grep -i marble
/usr/local/lib/libmarblewidget.20.dylib (compatibility version
20.0.0, current version 0.19.20)
$ otool -L /usr/local/lib/libmarblewidget.20.dylib |grep -i marble
/Users/henrik/src/marble/build/src/lib/astro/libastro.1.dylib
(compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 0.17.20)
$ ls -lhL /usr/local/lib/libmarblewidget.20.dylib
/Users/henrik/src/marble/build/src/lib/astro/libastro.1.dylib
-rwxr-xr-x 1 henrik staff 291K Oct 21 21:52
/Users/henrik/src/marble/build/src/lib/astro/libastro.1.dylib
-rwxr-xr-x 1 henrik admin 6.7M Oct 21 20:38
/usr/local/lib/libmarblewidget.20.dylib
But anyway.
I've switched to the Subsurface-testing branch, successfully built
Subsurface with it, and prepared new build docs. Still not interested?
Henrik
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
