On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote: > Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:31:08PM +0100, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote: > >>- Uses latest Marble from official sources, no special branch or patches > >>necessary. > > > >No. Not good. You get the weird Wiki-shit and strange context menues and > >it tries to load plugins and all kind of oddities. We really don't want > >the stock marble. Trust me > > Yeah, I see the ugly wiki stuff. Haven't seen any other side effects > though.
There were a couple of bugs where setting the position doesn't work with the full Marble version. There still appears to be one bug that I haven't tracked down, but since I switched the Windows binaries to use my hacked Marble version the reports of issues with the globe have gone way down. Now all of the "official" binaries use that branch :-) > >>- Fewer options in Subsurface qmake. > >> > >>Disadvantages: > >>- Somewhat longer Marble build instructions. But I could make a script in > >>packages/macosx/ to fix that (if anyone wants it). > > > >Have you looked at the SIZE of your marble libs? My guess is around > >100MB... > > Nope, the upstream libs were less than 7MB (even when astro was included by > mistake): Oh good, so they fixed that but. Until not too long ago they always created the Debug build, even when asking for a Release build. > I've switched to the Subsurface-testing branch, successfully built > Subsurface with it, and prepared new build docs. Still not interested? Of course I'm interested :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
