On 6 March 2015 at 13:13, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06.03.2015, at 10:31, Anton Lundin <[email protected]> wrote: > > As far as i can understand http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWebEngine , Qt's > html renderer is based on chromium so i don't think its lacking any > bells and whistles. > > > I am glad to hear that. Still we need it to describe a printed page rather > (with elements to grow/shrink to fit paper sizes etc) than an page in a web > browser. As a start, I just tried to produce some simple example with > LibreOfficeWriter and save that as html but the output is not even close to > the way the document looked. >
yeah, HTML is really only well fit for web browsers and as everyone knows when you print a web-page it may look *a bit* different in terms of layout / scaling etc. we are going to need some experiments with Grantlee and a renderer (e.g. WebKit) to see to what extent we can get it to be WYSIWYG. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
