> I agree with Linus that UDDF is the definition of bloated. Otoh it sees to be > the least common divisor if a lot of software in this sector. >
If you do decide to go the UDDF route (and I strongly recommend you don't), then get in touch with me. We're currently on a 'beta' version of the UDDF spec, which isn't yet published. This might seem quite irregular, but it doesn't introduce changes to the format - it simply fixes errata in the published spec, including a number of inconsistencies between the spec and the XSD schema. _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
