Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> For that reason we have our own fork of Marble from which we build a much > smaller custom libssrfmarblewidget... Subsurface 4.5 will require that > library and has it's name hardcoded. Of course, Subsurface being open > source a determined maintainer could easily work around that :-) > > Similarly, we have our own version of libdivecomputer that includes some > changes that upstream wasn't ready to take and that improve the user > experience. We document that behavior in our user manual and it's > confusing to the user if this isn't what happens. thanks. These are good reasons to justify fedora packaging use the bundled components then. I'll see if I can help make that happen. If successful, would that mean you'd withdraw your request that fedora not ship subsurface? -- rex _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
