On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:53:18PM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:38:41PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > And my patch from yesterday fixes it for that case, so I somewhat > > suspect that maybe the nightly build ended up using the normal > > libdivecomputer branch, and didn't actually get that fix. > > Correct. See the email I just sent. > > > > I'm on it. And this time I'll verify that the Windows binary contains the > > > correct libdivecomputer bits. > > > > Well, with the logging improvements in that patch, it will also be > > very obvious from the log output if the changes are there or not.. > > > > I do have a small cleanup patch that further improves the error case > > messages, and that removes a now-unnecessary change from the first > > patch. It's not really a big deal, and should not matter for this all, > > but I'm attaching it just for completeness. > > I'll apply this to Subsurface-testing and can make new binaries with that > as well. Now that I actually have fixed the bug that made my script pick > up the wrong libdivecomputer library on my build server (it always used > the "production" branch, even if explicitly told to use the -testing > branch)
4.4.2-500 is building and should be up shortly This will have this latest patch as well (I hope) :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
