On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:20:59AM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > > > > > > http://trac.subsurface-divelog.org/ticket/779 > > > > > > > > It seems like there is still some use case not covered. > > > > > > Yes, both Tomaz and I have been banging our heads against the zoom > bug. It > > > seems so easy and straight forward when I think about it, but somehow > the > > > implementation is entirely non-trivial because of the time it takes > Marble > > > to do the "flying" from one location to another. > > > > > > > If marble used sane state checkings for the flying this would work. > > Maybe we could also update marble code on subsurface? We are using the > > marble from two versions ago, and tons of bugs were fixed. > > :-) > > That's the downside of having your own branch. Maintenance work. > I'll add it to my short list of tasks that I need to take care of :-) > We can always push this upstream too. All work that you had was to remove things we didn't wanted and prepare marble to be a proper library - they want the 'proper library' part. > > /D >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
