On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:25:01AM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:20:59AM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://trac.subsurface-divelog.org/ticket/779 > > > > > > > > > > It seems like there is still some use case not covered. > > > > > > > > Yes, both Tomaz and I have been banging our heads against the zoom > > bug. It > > > > seems so easy and straight forward when I think about it, but somehow > > the > > > > implementation is entirely non-trivial because of the time it takes > > Marble > > > > to do the "flying" from one location to another. > > > > > > > > > > If marble used sane state checkings for the flying this would work. > > > Maybe we could also update marble code on subsurface? We are using the > > > marble from two versions ago, and tons of bugs were fixed. > > > > :-) > > > > That's the downside of having your own branch. Maintenance work. > > I'll add it to my short list of tasks that I need to take care of :-) > > > > We can always push this upstream too. All work that you had was to remove > things we didn't wanted and prepare marble to be a proper library - they > want the 'proper library' part.
I'm not sure that's a mountain I want to climb. My changes are mostly quick and dirty. I remove MASSIVE parts of the code that Subsurface doesn't care about. It would be a big project to take this all and make it reasonable for upstream to accept. I definitely do not have the time to tackle that right now. But I'll look into moving things forward to the latest version. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
