On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:37:37PM +0300, Miika Turkia wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:25 AM, Salvo Tomaselli <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> It is indeed the Facebook site, shown the way Facebook recommends that > >>> applications do things. The challenge with opening it in a separate > >>> browser window is getting back the token into Subsurface. Not impossible, > >>> but not something anyone has undertaken. > >> > >> I can't think of an obvious easy way to do it. The way gwenview does it > >> is to open the browser window and then the user needs to copy and > >> paste the URL into the application. > >> > >> It is a bit bad, but I would be more reassured that it is indeed Facebook. > > > > I think as a user experience it sucks. And I think the vast majority of > > users > > would much prefer what we have today. > > What would it take to have a button to view the server certificate > details? Would that be enough to sooth the nerves of the paranoid > people?
No. Our UI is convoluted enough. We will not add more convoluted things for the people who will not be happy with whatever we do, anyway. Simply don't use Facebook. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
