Hi, > On 20 Sep 2015, at 07:46, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > But regardless how much I stare at this, I can't see why we have entries > for 2005 and then 1996, so 33:25 and then 33:16. > > The Uemis contains a sample at 33:25, but none at 33:16. And this happens > when switching to the Atomics. So... hu???
I figured that what is special about 33:16 is that there is a sample with 0 depth at 33:17. When I delete all 0 depth samples from the Uemis, the problem goes away. My guess (so far unconfirmed is that some part of the code uses 0 depth as some kind of in band signalling…). Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
