Am 24.02.16 um 07:42 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:10:04AM +0200, Miika Turkia wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:55:28PM -0500, Richard Houser wrote:
#4 Dives exported from subsurface to divelogs.de are now showing an
additional 0.1lb more than what they show in subsurface.
Rounding error somewhere. Silly American pounds.
Both Subsurface and divelogs.de work in metric units internally. I
just did a quick test and 5lb turns out to be 2.268 kg in Subsurface
and is displayed as 2.2 kg on the divelist. Divelogs.de displays this
as 2.3 kg (as is correct rounding). However, it seems that divelogs.de
uses this rounded number when displaying the imperial weight (5.1
lbs). What has changed, I have no idea, but Rainer might be able to
clarify. (Us showing incorrect metric rounding is irrelevant regarding
divelogs.de import/export as we use the exact value in calculations
and export.)
That's odd, Rainer. Why would you convert the rounded value?
I don't...
Just entered a weight of 2.268 kilos in a dive at divelogs.de (which I
do round to 2 digits, as I never thought a few grams would be of
importance).
This results in 2.27 kilos in the database and diplays as exactly 5 lbs
on the dive after setting my logbook to imperial. I have the feeling,
that the dive had 2.3 kilos when it got into divelogs.de (as this would
explain the 5.1 lbs). I don't do any additional rounding when reading
the XML of the DLD files, so I'd like to check what got exported to
divelogs.de
Richard, could you please give me a link to the dive? How did the dive
get into divelogs.de? The exact path of where the dive went in its
digital life would help figure out where the rounding got screwed up.
Thanks,
Rainer
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
