> On Jan 1, 2017, at 2:24 AM, Tomaz Canabrava <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Robert Helling <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> On 01 Jan 2017, at 10:26, Robert C. Helling <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Sure I could do that. But my "legacy" point is that there are many forks of
>> Linus' repository. So you will be sending people this mail a few times in
>> the future.
>
> Just compare
>
> https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/network/members
> <https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/network/members>
>
> to
>
> https://github.com/dirkhh/subsurface/network/members
> <https://github.com/dirkhh/subsurface/network/members>
>
> True, as I'm also one f the members of torvalds, but considering that
> subsurface-develop is a new repo on github, I don't see any problems
> let's remember that we have around 10 active developers so the number of
> members there doesn't really matter.
I agree with Tomaz, but Robert pointed out that this is actually much easier
than
I though. So I just moved the "new" repo out of the way and transferred the
original
repo that Linus and transferred to me over to Subsurface-divelog.
As a result, the Subsurface-divelog/subsurface repo now has 1159 stars and 285
forks.
So my apologies to Miika, Salvador and Henrik, who forked the new repo and now
need to do this all over again to fork the transferred repo (Henrik, I'll move
the
latest pull request with the year change over myself, no worries).
I think with this everyone should be happy
Thanks for helping me figure this out
/D
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
