On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2017, at 2:24 AM, Tomaz Canabrava <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 01 Jan 2017, at 10:26, Robert C. Helling <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Sure I could do that. But my "legacy" point is that there are many forks >> of Linus' repository. So you will be sending people this mail a few times in >> the future. >> >> >> Just compare >> >> https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/network/members >> >> to >> >> https://github.com/dirkhh/subsurface/network/members > > > True, as I'm also one f the members of torvalds, but considering that > subsurface-develop is a new repo on github, I don't see any problems > let's remember that we have around 10 active developers so the number of > members there doesn't really matter. > > > I agree with Tomaz, but Robert pointed out that this is actually much easier > than > I though. So I just moved the "new" repo out of the way and transferred the > original > repo that Linus and transferred to me over to Subsurface-divelog. > > As a result, the Subsurface-divelog/subsurface repo now has 1159 stars and > 285 > forks.
Then you should update the text that states: This isn't the official upstream - please use Subsurface-divelog/subsurface https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog… > So my apologies to Miika, Salvador and Henrik, who forked the new repo and > now > need to do this all over again to fork the transferred repo (Henrik, I'll > move the > latest pull request with the year change over myself, no worries). > > I think with this everyone should be happy Let's see if I can get my updates somehow merged to the new repo... miika _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
