Hi Rick, > On 19 Feb 2017, at 23:54, Rick Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note, we have a subsurface_conservatism_factor variable in deco.c, which is > used to increase the critical radii by 1.2%, which increases the conservatism > slightly. With the saturation/desaturation values being set to zero, which > appears (in your changes to testplan.cpp on GitHub) to increase the deco > time, we could try reducing or eliminating the conservatism factor variable. > Unfortunately, I have no time for checking this myself at the moment.
I just remembered this about 10 minutes ago. And in fact, with both factors 1.0, removing our conservatism fudge factor gives values very close to the benchmark. Will updated this soon. Thanks for you explanation. Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
