On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > On 15 November 2017 at 17:03, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:36:25PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: > >> On 15 November 2017 at 16:27, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > With Lubomir's changes there are two ways to get the console output: > >> > > >> > You can run from cmd.exe - then the output is shown on the screen, but > >> > not > >> > saved to the log files. > >> > Or you can run this by double clicking on the executable. Then the log > >> > output is saved to the two log files. > >> > > >> > >> something to note here, is that by default when the Subsurface.exe is > >> started from the desktop shortcut, the log files would remain mostly > >> empty because the executable does not receive any "-v" arguments. > >> so to see verbose output the user has to manually append the "-v"s in > >> the desktop shortcut <path-to-exe> field. > > > > Which makes me wonder... should we just use verbose=1 as default if > > started from the shortcut on Windows? > > > > i was implying the same question, in a way. > but then, what if the user needs to see something which requires more > verbose levels? > he/she has to append more "-v"s to the shortcut. > > would "1" suffice, by default?
IIRC the higher levels give you detailed parsing info and similar extremely verbose information. I rarely see a reason to go there. So I think '1' is a reasonable default for this. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
