I believe it is a simple setting in the manifest. android:installLocation which can be either "preferExternal" or "auto" (or not present, to disallow moving to SD). I suspect this may have changed.
However, there are certain types of app which can not/should not be moved to SD. It may be that subsurface has started to fall into one of these categories. The various reasons can be found here: https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/data/install-location.html Martin On 25 February 2018 at 15:43, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'll admit that I have no idea what gates the ability of an app to be moved to SD card. I don't own any Android devices that support SD card, so I can't even test this... > > /D > > On February 25, 2018 2:58:48 AM PST, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have the Beta version of subsurface mobile on my Samsung tablet. I had it stored on the SD card. The latest update could not update on the SD card. I transferred the App to the tablet's memory and updated successfully. >> I then tried to transfer the App back to the SD card but wasn't able to. >> Regards, >> Paul Cole. >> >> Virus-free. www.avg.com > > > -- > from my phone. > > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
