On 28 February 2018 at 13:35, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 February 2018 at 13:23, Long, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I believe it is a simple setting in the manifest. android:installLocation >> which can be either "preferExternal" or "auto" (or not present, to disallow >> moving to SD). I suspect this may have changed. >> >> However, there are certain types of app which can not/should not be moved to >> SD. It may be that subsurface has started to fall into one of these >> categories. > > i've checked the value in our manifest and it's > android:installLocation="auto". > > maybe our underlying framework is the cause - Qt. > yet quickly googling about Qt apps that don't work from a SD card i > can't find any results. > >> The various reasons can be found here: >> https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/data/install-location.html >> > > "Applications That Should NOT Install on External Storage" > > i don't think we fall under that category in terms of our code base. > again, it could be a generic Qt issue. > > it's best if you can log an issue in our github if you have an account: > https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/issues >
could be an issue with that particular device and we don't have control over that - e.g. a Samsung specific sandobox. can you try on another Android device? lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
