On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote:
> > > On Apr 4, 2018, at 9:20 PM, Benjamin <nyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This is a hint that we're not generating enough log files because we are > not diving enough? :) > > Definitely. I haven't been diving since last October. Ridiculous. I plan > to fix this on Sunday. > > With Linus' help I was able to reduce the memory footprint of the git > repos a bit. At this point we have cloud storage for over 5000 dive logs in > about 5GB. And enough space for about another 40 thousand users. > For some reason my log used to be 1,5GB before I cleared the history and force pushed it 2 years ago :D (Did we embed pics in the git repo at some point?) My backup bare repository on my own server seems to be 5,1MB but that is missing dives from the last trip. Apparently the average log size is somewhat smaller than mine. Just wondering if my log on Dirk's server uses roughly the same amount or if you guys did really manage to optimize it a lot. The size of the checked out repository that Subsurface caches locally is 37MB if someone is wondering... miika
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
