Dear all, On Friday, 22 February 2019 21:37:18 CET Dirk Hohndel wrote: > We went through a few painful iterations in the dive site handling and ended > up on a compromise that few of us really love, many of us actually actively > dislike and that we really want to get to a better state.
From the comments so far, it seems to me that there are at least four, probably more, not completely independent problem fields. 1) The UI. We want a list of dive sites with add / edit / remove / search functionality. 2) Dive site fields. Is one GPS coordinate sufficient? 3) Semantics of editing dive sites. Copy on write? 4) Synchronization of dive sites between distinct dive logs. Since I was planning on integrating the dive site handling into the undo- system anyway, I propose that I realize 1) while I'm at it. Since I recently replaced dive site UUIDs by pointers I hope that I still have a decent overview concerning this part of the code base. But give me a week or two (first I want to finish the grunt work of undo of the notes-tab). For 2) to 4) I'll not interfere, as what we have so far is adequate to me. Berthold _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
