> On Feb 24, 2019, at 4:00 AM, Henrik B A <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 6:32 PM Dirk Hohndel <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I believe Henrik's proposal pre-dated us adding the country field. I see no > reason to remove the country field. > > No, my initial propose had Site name, Location and Country. But I got so > much opposition from even mentioning anything resembling a taxonomy, so my > proposal (that you pasted in the OP) is stripped down dive site database > proposal with only Site name & GPS. It is a bare bones thing that all other > fanciness could build upon :)
Hrmpf. More apologizing for me to do, I guess. I can be rather difficult when I dig down... Sorry again. I find 'country' useful. The further down you go with taxonomy, the trickier it gets. But I'm certainly willing to reopen that conversation as well. /D
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
