On 2020/05/14 18:24, Dirk Hohndel wrote:

Willem, those are some very strong statements that initially provoked a rather negative reaction in me. Calling someone else's proposal "not up to modern standards" feels borderline insulting. As a matter of fact, yes we can show vertical labels. They are also a complete pain to read. I would argue that the readability of a horizontal chart is actually much better than the vertical one that you so strongly argue for. I did a quick survey of some of the other dive logs that have screen shots of their statistics pages up on their web sites. And they seem to be about equally split between the two different approaches.

I apologise unreservedly if I appeared insulting to anyone.


To me in the end this doesn't really matter. I don't think I'd ever use this other than to test that it works. Which is true for two thirds, actually, more likely 80% of the features in Subsurface. What I do care about is that we continue to build something that stays maintainable, stays usable, and serves the need of a broad user base. That's why I refuse the frequent attempts to turn Subsurface into an asset management tool. And that's why I will gently push back to attempts to turn Subsurface into tool for statisticians. There are great tools for those purposes. Use them.

I attach a suggestion that, to me, what it does is to actually plot the raw data points and show what the mean value for each dataset is (red bar). This is much more usable than a mere report of min, mean, max. For instance, for the wetsuit dataset, the bottom two points are probably outliers (possibly erroneous cylinder pressures or cylinder type entered into the dive log?) and one might consider not using these to interpret the data. For wetsuit, it appears that SAC mostly varies between 13 and 21, and that the min and max values indicated are not necessarily so useful. For the semidry suit data, the data points are much more cohesive and the min and max values plotted are possibly more useful. It depends on the person looking at the graph to use the min and max as plotted, or to use some other way of interpretation. This would provide a good impression of the distribution of the SAC data for each suit type and still provide mean, max and min values. And I think most persons should be able to interpret the diagram easily?

Kind regards,

willem







--
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer.

Please refer to 
http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf <http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf> for full details.
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to