I really like this. And it very much matches what was said in the video that 
Pedro mentioned: "Show all the data when possible". And it does that perfectly. 
So yes, I like that and I think it's a really cool way to visualize SAC rates.
I need to spend time to think through all the 'y-axis' values that we are 
planning to present there, but at first glance this would work for depths and 
durations and temperatures as well...

/D

> On May 14, 2020, at 12:04 PM, Willem Ferguson via subsurface 
> <subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> To me in the end this doesn't really matter. I don't think I'd ever use this 
>> other than to test that it works. Which is true for two thirds, actually, 
>> more likely 80% of the features in Subsurface.
>> What I do care about is that we continue to build something that stays 
>> maintainable, stays usable, and serves the need of a broad user base. That's 
>> why I refuse the frequent attempts to turn Subsurface into an asset 
>> management tool. And that's why I will gently push back to attempts to turn 
>> Subsurface into tool for statisticians. There are great tools for those 
>> purposes. Use them.
> 
> I attach a suggestion that, to me, what it does is to actually plot the raw 
> data points and show what the mean value for each dataset is (red bar). This 
> is much more usable than a mere report of min, mean, max. For instance, for 
> the wetsuit dataset, the bottom two points are probably outliers (possibly 
> erroneous cylinder pressures or cylinder type entered into the dive log?) and 
> one might consider not using these to interpret the data. For wetsuit, it 
> appears that SAC mostly varies between 13 and 21, and that the min and max 
> values indicated are not necessarily so useful. For the semidry suit data, 
> the data points are much more cohesive and the min and max values plotted are 
> possibly more useful. It depends on the person looking at the graph to use 
> the min and max as plotted, or to use some other way of interpretation. This 
> would provide a good impression of the distribution of the SAC data for each 
> suit type and still provide mean, max and min values. And I think most 
> persons should be able to interpret the diagram easily?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> willem
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to