> The only problem I see is that the same name is used to denominate a > community project and a private initiative. These are two different > things but not different enough to avoid confusion. > > I'm not talking right now about name ownership, that's why I listed as > a possible solution that the community project drops the "sugar on a > stick" name and chooses something else. Each possible solution has its > own upsides and downsides but I'm not there yet, I'm only exposing the > problem for now. Do we agree we are now in a confusing situation that > unless we solve it will have bad consequences for all?
How about sugaronastick.com for the private initiative and sugaronastick.org for the upstream community project ? Lot's of FOSS projects do that. And I guess that Caroline and her crew from sugaronastick.com will participate actively in the community SoaS. If this is not a far-away derivative, couldn't that work ? ---------- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel