On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:15, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) <[email protected]> wrote: >> The only problem I see is that the same name is used to denominate a >> community project and a private initiative. These are two different >> things but not different enough to avoid confusion. >> >> I'm not talking right now about name ownership, that's why I listed as >> a possible solution that the community project drops the "sugar on a >> stick" name and chooses something else. Each possible solution has its >> own upsides and downsides but I'm not there yet, I'm only exposing the >> problem for now. Do we agree we are now in a confusing situation that >> unless we solve it will have bad consequences for all? > > How about sugaronastick.com for the private initiative and > sugaronastick.org for the upstream community project ? > > Lot's of FOSS projects do that. > > And I guess that Caroline and her crew from sugaronastick.com will > participate actively in the community SoaS. > > If this is not a far-away derivative, couldn't that work ?
I think it could work, it's the second possibility I listed before. Again, it has its upsides and downsides that need to be discussed. Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
