On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi, > > I know it's not Write. But Write has an undocumented dependency on a > certain Abiword version plus not yet up streamed patches.That's very > developer unfriendly. How am I'm supposed to pull the sources and get it to > work? That normally doesn't require subscribing to a mailing list and > asking. > > Activities has an implicit dependency on the sugar platform. But we don't > have any good definition of what that platform is. I'm going to write a > separate proposal about that, but, until the problem is solved, I think > documenting the Abiword dependency in Write is much better than nothing. > > I agree. Just we are doing changes _right_now_ and with a lot of work to do in a fixed schedule. If anybody is interested in help solving bugs, I will be the first in help him, but sadly, nobody asked... > About the branch. According to > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/GTK3/Porting#GIT_conventions > > "We've agreed that the GTK3 version should be in the master branch on > gitorious.sugarlabs.org. The GTK2 version should be in a branch called > gtk2." > > > Is that changed? Otherwise can we please keep as much consistency as > possible? It's a bit of pain to find the branch you want for activities > right now. > > I don't know why Walter added that, when we have a previously agreed convention in the same page: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/GTK3/Porting#Preparation You know "standards are so good, than everybody want own one" :) Gonzalo > Thanks. > > On Wednesday, 31 October 2012, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> The problem is not Write, but Abiword, because we need a few patches >> under review right now. >> The gtk2 branch is origin/sugar-0.94 in Write and is available. >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Can we put links to the upstream bugs/patches (not to the rpms) >>> somewhere? In a README file or something. Right now if you want to >>> build Write on anything else than Fedora 18, you have no idea how to >>> do it. >>> >>> Also a gtk2 branch would be nice to have since the gtk3 version will >>> not work on Ubuntu, for example. I would switch sugar-build to it >>> until the patches are upstreamed and shipped in distros. >>> >>> (For what it's worth I think this is the only case where keeping gtk2 >>> on master and making a gtk3 branch would have made more sense, but I >>> suppose it's too late for that) >>> >>> On 21 October 2012 19:49, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: >>> > Part of the changes needed by touch interaction has not be reviewed yet >>> > upstream, >>> > and will not be ready for the next release. The plan is use a custom >>> rpm >>> > now, >>> > and try to have the needed changes included asap to use a standard >>> fedora >>> > rpm. >>> > >>> > Gonzalo >>> > >>> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Has the patch been submitted upstream yet? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sunday, 21 October 2012, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Can you check the version of the Write activity you are using? >>> >>> If the version is >= 80, is a gtk3 version, and only will work >>> >>> with the last abiword version, in fact, we are using a patched >>> version >>> >>> and you download it here >>> >>> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1205046 >>> >>> >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Coltivare Fiori >>> >>> <coltivarefi...@connettivo.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hello to everybody! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Attempting to understand spellchecking in the Write Activity, I've >>> been >>> >>>> compiling Sugar 0.97.8 on a standard Fedora 17 installation (after >>> some >>> >>>> issues with the proposed updates and reverting to a clean install). >>> >>>> >>> >>>> After launching Sugar with "make run", I cannot start the Write >>> activity >>> >>>> and I get in the Write log an error >>> >>>> >>> >>>> "Could not find any typelib for abi" >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I have been installing, besides pyabiwor, pyabiword-devel >>> >>>> (0.8.0-8.fc17.i686) but to no avail. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> What am I missing? Shall I recompile Sugar? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> TIA >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Ernesto >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> >>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> >>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Daniel Narvaez >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Narvaez >>> >> >> > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel