On 31 October 2012 15:10, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I know it's not Write. But Write has an undocumented dependency on a >> certain Abiword version plus not yet up streamed patches.That's very >> developer unfriendly. How am I'm supposed to pull the sources and get it to >> work? That normally doesn't require subscribing to a mailing list and >> asking. >> >> Activities has an implicit dependency on the sugar platform. But we don't >> have any good definition of what that platform is. I'm going to write a >> separate proposal about that, but, until the problem is solved, I think >> documenting the Abiword dependency in Write is much better than nothing. >> > > I agree. Just we are doing changes _right_now_ and with a lot of work to do > in a fixed schedule. > If anybody is interested in help solving bugs, I will be the first in help > him, > but sadly, nobody asked...
I know you guys are busy and I don't want to keep wasting your time (in this discussion too!). Though let me just suggest that putting links to the upstream bugs in a text file wouldn't take much time. Using a separate branch/repo until the dependencies went upstream, would have taken even less time. The more people can easily build sugar and activities without pain, the more help we will get, imho. >> About the branch. According to >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/GTK3/Porting#GIT_conventions >> >> "We've agreed that the GTK3 version should be in the master branch on >> gitorious.sugarlabs.org. The GTK2 version should be in a branch called >> gtk2." >> >> >> Is that changed? Otherwise can we please keep as much consistency as >> possible? It's a bit of pain to find the branch you want for activities >> right now. >> >> > > I don't know why Walter added that, when we have a previously agreed > convention in the same page: > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/GTK3/Porting#Preparation > > You know "standards are so good, than everybody want own one" :) Haha, please let's pick a standard, it doesn't really matter which. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel