Ivan and Marco, We do need to be able to install both activity bundles and library content bundles in Trial-3. I know SJ's group has been working on the .xol files, and there is a spec on this so please send email/talk, whatever to make sure they have the information they need and ask the questions that you need answered.
There is a future feature which is called 'extended bundles'. This has been described as bundles that might contain many different types of content and activities. This is not expected to be ready for trial-3. SJ, Could you please send out links to the .xol spec to this group so people can comment and ask questions. Thanks, Kim On 8/24/07, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/24/07, Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > > > > Anybody from the security team can tell how will activities access > > > those > > > files when security is in place? > > > > One way to implement it would be for the installer service to unpack > > all .xol bundles as folders under a common root, e.g. /home/shared, > > which then gets mapped into containers as /shared at container > > initialization time. > > > > This is the first I've heard of content bundles, however, so I'd have > > to think about it more. Is this something we're aiming to do for FRS? > > I haven't seen it in any of the roadmaps or schedules. Kim? > > Looks like a typo in the roadmap... > > "auto-install of .xo files (#2856)" > > But 2856 is about .xol files... > > Marco >
_______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
