Marco, Apologies if I confused you. Composition does make the animation much smoother. Instead, I was making the UI statement that, having tried both animation with today's constants and no animation, I prefer no animation. (A higher frame rate or a shorter animation might work just as well.) I included the code merely so that others could try the same experiment more easily.
Nothing special here, Michael On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:56:07AM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dear sugar developers, > > > > I've been looking for easily modifiable UI "features" that feel to me to be > > less than snappy. Compositing support has made animation of the frame > > into one > > of these "features"; therefore, here is a patch that removes it for your > > experimental consideration. Feel free to apply it (or to ignore it) as your > > preferences dictate. > > I'm confused. Are you saying that compositing made frame animation > less than snappy? I'd expect the opposite and the testing reports I > got so far confirms the theory. > > Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
