On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  As any new module/activity will add some overhead to the release team,
>  perhaps we should ask that any module included in the release process
>  has to provide functionality that the community believes is important
>  to the project goals?
>
>  So maybe we should ask such a new point:
>
>   * Provide functionality that the community judges as important for
>  reaching the goals of the project.

Yeah, I think we will need to define some relevance criteria. I wanted
to let those emerge from the concrete activities discussions rather
than defining them upfront... but your generic definition sounds
pretty good, please add it to the wiki so that we keep this in mind.

Marco
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Reply via email to