On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As any new module/activity will add some overhead to the release team, > > > perhaps we should ask that any module included in the release process > > > has to provide functionality that the community believes is important > > > to the project goals? > > > > > > So maybe we should ask such a new point: > > > > > > * Provide functionality that the community judges as important for > > > reaching the goals of the project. > > > > Yeah, I think we will need to define some relevance criteria. I wanted > > to let those emerge from the concrete activities discussions rather > > than defining them upfront... but your generic definition sounds > > pretty good, please add it to the wiki so that we keep this in mind. > > Btw I think a good way to start defining some of those criteria > concretely might be a discussion on its.an.education.project list. > Also Walter wrote some criteria to determine the core activities which > we could reuse in this context.
Will initiate such a thread. One thing I don't have completely clear is the meaning of an activity being part of the Sugar release. Which implications has? Thanks, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
