This is exactly what I think about it. Thanks so much for writing it down so clearly.
Marco On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recently, I've encountered several people who seem to be looking for > perspective on the relationship between OLPC and SugarLabs. I'd like > to offer a few thoughts for them to chew on: > > 1. Sugar is good enough to be interesting to lots of people in the > world, in particular, people who don't have XOs. > > 2. In order to reach more people, Sugar needs to be "natively > accessible", e.g. by being packaged for their favorite > distributions (and operating systems, as we start looking at the > larger world). > > 3. We would like more contributions; even if some of them do not fit > with the user experience we want to provide on the XO. SugarLabs is > a fine place to capture many kinds of contributions. > > 4. Finally, insofar as OLPC and its partners continue to pay the > salaries of Sugar developers, supply useful infrastructure, and > represent the largest chunk of the Sugar install base, OLPC and > its partners will continue to have a lot of say in the development > of Sugar. > > Regards, > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Sugar mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
