Same feeling here. Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > This is exactly what I think about it. Thanks so much for writing it > down so clearly. > > Marco > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Recently, I've encountered several people who seem to be looking for >> perspective on the relationship between OLPC and SugarLabs. I'd like >> to offer a few thoughts for them to chew on: >> >> 1. Sugar is good enough to be interesting to lots of people in the >> world, in particular, people who don't have XOs. >> >> 2. In order to reach more people, Sugar needs to be "natively >> accessible", e.g. by being packaged for their favorite >> distributions (and operating systems, as we start looking at the >> larger world). >> >> 3. We would like more contributions; even if some of them do not fit >> with the user experience we want to provide on the XO. SugarLabs is >> a fine place to capture many kinds of contributions. >> >> 4. Finally, insofar as OLPC and its partners continue to pay the >> salaries of Sugar developers, supply useful infrastructure, and >> represent the largest chunk of the Sugar install base, OLPC and >> its partners will continue to have a lot of say in the development >> of Sugar. >> >> Regards, >> >> Michael >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar >> > _______________________________________________ > Sugar mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
-- \___/ _| X | Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \|_O_| "It's an education project, not a laptop project!" _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
