On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Why so? The journal code would be in site-packages and the shell would >>> use it in the same way it is using the sugar lib. >> >> Well, both the shell and the journal are private code. We need to come >> up with a consistent "strategy" for private code in site-packages. > > What about sugar/_shell and sugar/_journal? > > Although we don't need to move the shell code there just for executing > the journal inside its process.
Ping! What people think about this? Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
