On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:55:30PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> > What about sugar/_shell and sugar/_journal?
>>
>> Ping!
>>
>> What people think about this?
>
> Seems fine to me, though personally, the idea of 'private Sugar code'
> strikes me as nonsensical. Presumably you mean 'code with no api
> guarantees'?

Right.

Tomeu
_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Reply via email to